Sports December 4, 2011

The new look Miami Marlins have completely changed their personnel philosophy. Instead of the stingy, money saving team they have been in the past, they have decided to bay big money to get prime free agents. Yet, I am not of the opinion that this will work out. The team that has the best offseason usually doesn't have the have the most regular season success (except in the NBA). I know the Yankees won a World Series a couple years ago after a great offseason, but that is an exception and a case in which the Yankees happened to get the right guys. The opposite case is this years Eagles team, who got so many good players in the offseason and have many players with good individual seasons, but have not panned out as a team. The Eagles also failed because one of their key players, Desean Jackson, was/ is disgruntled. The Marlins are going through a similar situation. One of their best players, Hanley Ramirez, is also disgruntled because he may have to move positions. Though Hanley is one the best players in the game, he's moving from short to third because the Marlins got Jose Reyes, another elite shortstop. Because of this, there will be discord amongst the Marlins, and they may eventually fail. Keep in mind this year's Red Sox as well, another team with a bunch of good additions. They were good, but failed in the end, and many Red Sox fans blame it on the lack of a leader.

There's a case for Peyton Manning for MVP, and in my opinion, is actually quite compelling. Even though he is yet to play, and likely will not play, a snap this season, his value to his team is obvious. Last year, Manning took that team to a division title and the playoffs. The year before, he took them to the Super Bowl. But this year, the Colts are on record to be one of the worst teams of all time. That's a turn around that should not go unnoticed, even though Manning will likely not play this season.

Despite Manning, I think there is a better option for NFL MVP. No, it is not Rodgers, Brees, Brady, or any other conventional quarterback. I'm taking about Tim Tebow, and I'm not kidding. According to a study conducted by several Harvard student, Tebow is a miracle worker. Their justification is that the Broncos are statistically worse with Tebow as the quarterback than they were when Orton called the shots. On top of that, they lost Brandon Lloyd, a miracle worker in his own right and the NFL's leader in receiving yards a year ago. Isn't this what the entire award is about? To pick a player that has unmeasurable value to his team? So what if you don't like the way Tebow plays, he gets the job done and wins football games. It doesn't matter what his religious affiliations are, he is a winner and a great success. Sure, Rodgers is having an undefeated season and is on pace to be the best QB ever, but take any quaterback who can give the ball to those receivers and he'll make the playoffs (nothing on Rodgers, I don't think any QB can lead that team to a perfect record like he can). The Broncos were hopeless without Tebow and now, they're playoff bound. Even if he doesn't win it, I think Tebow should receive several MVP votes.

Sports December 4, 2011

Recently, I heard someone say Albert Pujols going to the Cubs this offseason would be good for baseball. True I think it would be ironic if Pujols was the one to end the Curse of the Billy Goat, I am not of that opinion. The best thing for baseball would be if Pujols stayed with the Cardinals and Prince Fielder stayed with the Brewers. Both of those guys staying put would mean that small market teams can keep star players and that the smaller markets are not farm systems for bigger market clubs. Pujols is possibly the best player in the game today, and if he were to leave St. Louis, it would be a big blow to the Cards in not only a good player, but possibly also ticket sales. If Pujols were to leave, several other small market stars may end up leaving themselves, and the MLB would become like the NBA. Fielder staying in Milwaukee would mean the same thing, except it would show a small market team could keep two stars, with Ryan Braun being the other. These two players should stay put to help small markets everywhere. Then again, I'm a Yankees fan. Bring all the super stars to New York under extraordinarily large contracts.

I have several problems with the NBA, one of them being the utter lack of player and team loyalty. In both the NFL and MLB, everyone says its an "Era of free agency" and that players are leaving teams on a regular basis. While that may be true, its nothing compared to the NBA. I mean, you don't see baseball and football teams trying to trade their best players so they can get ones they think are better. You would never see the Patriots actively trying to trade Tom Brady so they can get Peyton Manning or Aaron Rodgers. This is because there is loyalty between the Patriots and Brady. The same goes with baseball. The Red Sox would never trade Dustin Pedroia to get Robinson Cano because they are loyal to their players. The same does not go to the NBA. A prime example of this is the Celtics trying to deal Rajan Rondo for Chris Paul. Why? Chris Paul might be considered the best point guard in the league, but its not like Rondo is that far down the list. Sure, Rondo may have attitude problems, but he has performed well and deserves a reward. Also, is trading him really going to fix his attitude problems? Don't you owe it to him, after all the wins he has landed you, doesn't he deserve to start every game for the rest of his career as a Celtic? Just as it would be a shame if Pujols left the Cardinals, Rondo being traded from the Celtics would only show how NBA teams do not truly value their players.

Sports November 20, 2011

Although many people see the Astros moving to the AL as a move that will change the game for the better, I see it as a potential disaster. Sure it balances out the leagues and the divisions, but it leaves an odd number of teams in both leagues. Under the old system, and the one that will expire at the end of the 2012 baseball season, teams in the same league would play each other, and could because there were an even number of teams in each league. But now, interleague games will be played almost everyday. This may not matter for the first couple months of the season, but it will greatly affect the playoff races in September. Say, for example, the wild card leader has a slight lead over the second place team. The second place team, in September, has to play a tough team at the end of the season in its own league, while the first place team has to play the worst team in the other league. That will really mess up that race. Sure, you can argue that there are bad teams in both leagues, but shouldn't a playoff spot awarded in one league be decided by the teams in that league, not teams in the other league? The odd number of teams in each league will force this situation to become a reality, and a team that may not deserve to get a postseason spot may get in, while the other does not. True, the new rule that makes two wild card teams alleviates some of the problems, but there will still be race for the second spot, one that this situation decides incorrectly.

I also think the new wild card game has the right idea in mind. The Wild Card team should be penalized for not being a division winner and have some sort of handicap. The game will have huge implications, because it will make the Wild Card teams burn their best pitchers before the real playoffs start. One game is also the right number, because playing too many games will leave the division winners rusty, as is a common case with teams who sweep a team in the first round, then have a long lay over and end up losing. However, I don't think this rule handicaps the Wild Card enough. Any good team can win one game and then beat a far better team in a short series. Baseball is unique from a sport like Basketball in that the road team in the early rounds actually has a chance against a better team. So, I propose a new solution. The best team, in a five game series, should get 4 home games, with only Game 3 being played on the road. The rule that states that the best team can't play the Wild Card in the first round should be eliminated. The best team has earned the right to play the worst team in the first round, regardless of division. True, the Wild Card often has a better record than a division winner (look at the AL East dominance of the Wild Card spot), but the best team should have put a team in its own division away, given 18 opportunities to do so. The series between the other two division winners can remain the same, as a division winner cannot be severely handicapped. The one game playoff can stick around, I actually think it will be an exciting game, with a Game 7 like atmosphere.

More than halfway through the NFL season I hate the new kickoff rule. Kicking off from the 35 yard line has made kickoff returns obsolete and touchbacks all too common. Before, only the best kickers would get touchbacks, and those would be the elite kickers. Now, anyone who doesn't kick the ball through the endzone is considered below average. The return game has also disappeared. Hardly ever does a returner take the ball to mid field on a kick off anymore, and doing so has become very difficult. What was wrong with the old system anyway? What was wrong with a ~80% return rate? So what if one team has good field position consistently just because it has a good kick returner and a good kicker? This new rule is like saying you can't throw the ball over 20 yards down field and can only throw the ball 20 times a game. It's like saying its "unfair" to have a better quarterback that the other team and the player can only be used sparingly. I don't think these new rules are at all beneficial to the game. Football is unique in that it has 3 phases: offense, defense, and special teams. These new rules essentially eliminate a third of the last phase, and make football more of a 2 phase game. I hope the NFL sees the light and decides to go back to kicking off from the 30.

Sports October 23, 2011

I know Christian Ponder managed to keep the Vikings in the game against the Packers (even with 2 interceptions and a low completion percentage), I don't think the Vikings made the right decision by starting him against what looks like the greatest team of all time (they've won 12 straight including last regular and post season). Starting a rookie under those conditions is never good, especially when playing a division rival. I know the season is pretty much lost for the Vikings, but this was not the right time to use Ponder. A better time would be later in the season, maybe against another rebuilding team, to build confidence. After all, Ponder definitely has the talent, but only needs confidence to become a good quarterback. Over the last few seasons, the Vikings have been a good team when they have had good quarterback play, and developing a confident Christian Ponder is of vital importance. Donovan McNabb should have started today. Donovan is a veteran quaterback, and even though his skills are declining, has won big games in the past. He has also taken a good share of criticism in the past, and a little more can't tarnish his image.

The Colts also have a lost season, but for a different reason. They aren't winning because they lost their quarterback. People thought the Colts would be bad, but not this bad. It just goes to show you what an elite quarterback can actually do, and how good Peyton Manning actually is. Peyton makes the entire team better. The Colts receivers who used to be considered elite have had little to no production. The defensive players are also taking a hit. Dwight Freeney and Robert Mathis, however good pass rushers they are, benefited greatly from Manning. The Colts almost always used to play with a lead, forcing the other team to throw the ball. Freeney and Mathis could then focus on rushing the passer, and get huge sacks. That aspect is now missing, and the Colts now play a lot of games from behind. A stable quarterback situation should fix that problem, but now that the rest of the team has been exposed, how will opposing teams view them?

The Raiders also lost their quarterback. The acquisition of Carson Palmer, once an elite college and NFL player, made many believe in that the Raiders would run away with the division. However, the more vital injury was to Darren McFadden, a potential MVP candidate and the NFL's leading rusher. McFadden was the Raider's offense with Jason Campbell at quarterback, and if he's out for a long time, his presence will be missed. Oakland frankly can't get by throwing the ball the entire game. The Raiders do have speedy receivers, but none of them are intimidating for an opposing defense. Their quarterbacks are also not as good as they have been in the past, hurting the Raider's chances. The AFC West may not be the best of divisions, but the Raiders have their work cut out for them.

Sports October 17, 2011

How about the Cardinals? A few weeks ago, most people thought they were done. Now, they're going to play in the World Series. How about that? The Cardinals run this year is a testamate to the baseball postseason system. In other sports, a lowly wild card team has little or no shot at all at going anywhere. In basketball and hockey, the lowest seeded team most often has a losing record. Even that team wins Game 1, the low seed has to win 3 out of 6 games, something that they failed to do consistently over the season. Plus, the odds are stacked against them against a team that is much deeper than they are. Football is different in that the lower seeds can have success and the one game, do or die makes it more possible for that team to thrive. However, recent postseasons have shown that the wild card teams in the NFL, the 5th and 6th seeds, are actually good teams that play in the same division as a 1st or 2nd seeded team and has competed with those teams for most of the year. The true low seed in the NFL is the 4th seed. When was the last time a 4th seed won the Super Bowl? Baseball, however, is a lot different. Only having 4 teams in the postseason makes a huge difference. Any team then can have a shot at only having to win 2 games, no matter how lowly they were seeded. A wild card making the World Series happens all the time. The Cardinals postseason run is therefore not as surprising as their regular season run. Even then, in the regular season, the Cards made the playoffs because the Braves collapsed. Sometimes, its better to be lucky than good.

I know the Texans are a lowly 3-3, but I think they are a much better team than that and still are my favorite to win the AFC South. I say this because the best toughest part of their schedule is behind them. Going 1-3 in the last 4 weeks having played the Saints, Steelers, Raiders, and Ravens is quite an accomplishment. Their schedule eases up after this, and the only real tests until the end of the season are against the Titans. True, a championship caliber team would probably fair better against other teams they could be competing against in the playoffs, beating any team is a confidence boost. Don't be surprised in the Texans finish the season 13-3, their schedule allows for it, and they definitely do have the potential. You never know, they can even ride it all the way to the Super Bowl.

There was a lot of hype about the Jets entering this season, and yes they beat the winless Dolphins, but they really don't look like the championship them they were billed as. Frankly, there is very little they can do. Against some of the good teams they have played, the Ravens, Raiders, and Patriots, they could do hardly anything. The Raiders pounded what was supposed to be an elite defense for 200+ yards, and the ground and pound took another hit when they couldn't run for over 40 yards against the Ravens. Their passing game did not fair well against the Ravens either. Their pass defense is good, but that isn't how they Jets want to win games. Of course, their Special Teams has been outstanding, but I no team has ever won on Special Teams alone. The Jets need to find answers, and quickly before this season falls out of control.

Sports September 20, 2011

Apparently the Dolphins found out that Reggie Bush isn't exactly an every down back in the NFL the hard way. My question is why. Anyone, including me, could have told you that Reggie Bush isn't the best back going between the tackles. Don't get me wrong, Reggie Bush is an explosive players with big play potential that can help any team, but he isn't the standard back in the NFL. In New Orleans, Bush had the most success as a third down back making big plays in space. In my opinion, Reggie Bush might be more suited to play wide receiver in the NFL, and make big plays that way. Devin Hester is another fast explosive player who became a wide receiver in the NFL and has become a legitimate deep threat in Chicago. Percy Harvin, who used to be a running back, also became a wide receiver, and can use his explosiveness to make plays at that position. Brad Smith also became a wide receiver, and the list goes on. Reggie Bush can be a successful player at that position, as he catches many passes out of the backfield anyway.

How about Cam Newton. So much for not being NFL ready as many experts said. Newton has thrown for 400+ yards in his first two games in the NFL, breaking a rookie record, then breaking it again. True, one of those games was against a Cardinals defense that just lost its best corner, but accomplishing that feat against the Super Bowl champion Packers was especially impressive. The Packers last season had a nack for takeaways and a shut down secondary. True Newton did have 2 interceptions, but he still managed to make plays against the Packers for big yardage. The only problem in Carolina is that the Panthers have lost both games, but it would be unfair to blame Cam Newton.

Who would have thought the Redskins would be winning the NFC East after Week 2? Not only have they managed to jump out to a lead, the Redskin's lead looks keepable. To start with, Mike Shanahan has won more Super Bowls as a head coach than any other coach in that division. Rex Grossman has also led a team to a 13-3 record and a Super Bowl, although it is arguable that he rode the Bears' formidable defense for most of that season. But most importantly, the Redskins are healthy. A good portion of the Giants' defense is injured, and a bunch of players will miss this season. The Giants also have key injuries at the receiver position, something that won't help reduce the drops or interceptions. Tony Romo, Felix Jones, and Miles Austin are also all injured for the Cowboys, not to mention Dez Bryant limping in the game against the Jets. Injuries to those 4 players can cripple the Cowboys' offense. Michael Vick suffered a concussion against the Falcons on Sunday, and backup Vince Young is already out. Jeremy Maclin had a big game on Sunday, but he took a beating. Even if Vick does come back to play next week, his vulnerability will be exposed, especially against a pressure happy Giants' defense that knocked 4 quarterbacks out of games last season. However, there are 2 NFC East games next week, so all of this could turn very quickly...

Sports September 13, 2011

What happened to the Red Sox? A few weeks ago, they looked in place to win the AL East, or at least the Wild Card. Now, they appear to have lost the division to the Yankees, and the Wild Card spot they seemed so destined to win as a consolation is know being contested by the Rays. I know I predicted a potential apocalypse in Red Sox nation when Beckett went down, but that seems to be a minor injury. Yet, even with eminent return of their ace, the Red Sox seem to have run into disaster anyway. Yet, this pattern has been relatively common for the Red Sox over the last few years. With the exception of 2007, the only year since 1998 (the start of the Yankees winning 8 straight division titles and 10 out of the last 13) they've never won the AL East (2007 was the one year they did, and low and behold, they won a World Series that year). Other than that, the Red Sox have come out strong in the middle part of the season, only to fall short and lose the division at the end. The curse of the Bambino might be over, but the Red Sox still do have problems finishing seasons off.

What about the New York Giants defense? I know they lost on sunday, but a good portion of the Redskins' 28 points can be blamed on the offense. Despite several key injuries, and arguably the 3 best Giants defenders out, they still managed to make a few plays. One big play was made by Jason Pierre- Paul. I know I doubted that pick when it was made, but it has turned out to help the Giants. Despite their 2 sack leaders from a year ago missing the game, Pierre- Paul still managed to get pressure on the quarterback. On one play, he forced a key turnover that could have helped the Giants win the game. Unfortunately, the offense spoiled the opportunity, but Pierre- Paul still made a big time play worthy of recognition.

The Ravens finally broke through against the Steelers with Ben Roethlisberger. The Ravens have had their difficulties in recent years in recent years beating the Steelers with Roethlisberger, but have done fine when he was away. The Ravens also seemed to fall short every time they played Roethlisberger as well. But Sunday was a completely different story. The Ravens were all over the Steelers, both offensively and defensively. For at least one game, they appear to be the team that will win the AFC North.

Sports September 5, 2011

So the NFL season is about to start, and apparently Tiki Barber is going to have to cut his comeback attempt short and sit the season out. I found this to be of little surprise. What I did find surprising about this whole ordeal is why everyone else is. To start with, not many teams are willing to take chances on veteran running backs, especially if he hasn't played in few years. With players like Clinton Portis who have played the last few available, why take a shot at Tiki. Sure, Tiki was a great player, but that was 5 years ago. Times have changed, especially because passing games are becoming more relevant. Running backs at his age who have played the entire time tend to not whether seasons so well. Plus, Tiki took cheap shots at his former team in the broadcast booth, only to have them win the Super Bowl. On a side note, the Giants won the Super Bowl the year after Tiki left.

If you think Josh Beckett's injury isn't going to have any impact on the pennant race this year, I think your mistaken. Beckett, up to this point, was the Red Sox best pitcher and a possible Cy Young candidate (that is if Verland slips badly). Any injury at this point in the season can have a huge impact, especially one to a player of Beckett's caliber. The Red Sox can ill afford to lose him. Jon Lester has been their only other consistant starter this season. John Lackey and Tim Wakefield have struggled, and Clay Buchholz is already out. Erik Bedard has been good since he was acquired, but can he really be counted on in the postseason. The Red Sox seem to be a lock for the Post Season, but with Beckett lost, their chances seem to be slipping. They've fallen to 2.5 games behind the Yankees in the AL East. If they do lose the division, they might get stuck to playing the Rangers on the road, a team they've struggled against. If Beckett cannot make it, then they might have to pitch Lester on 3 days rest, a daunting task for anyone. I don't like their chances against the Rangers period, especially on the road without Beckett. Then again, I'm a Yankees fan, what do I care.

Speaking of rotations, weren't the Yankees supposed to have the question marks in their pitching staff. Granted, behind CC, there is no guaranteed Yankee's second starter, but the two rotations, that is if the Red Sox lose Becket, will have strikingly similar rotations: a dominant ace ahead to several question marks. Yet, in that situation, I think I would have to say advantage Yankees. The Yankees have the better bullpen, which is why they made no moves at the deadline to acquire pitching. The Yankees can afford to have their starters, other than CC, pitch only 5 innings because their bullpen can close out the last four. Don't forget that in recent games, the Yankees starters have done well. Also keep in mind that Ian Nova has won 15 games this season and hasn't lost in a long time. Both offenses can score, but the Yankees are more dynamic in their ability to steal bases. Head- to- head, the Red Sox are better, but the Yankees are better against other teams and took 2 of 3 in the last series at Fenway. If the Yankees and Red Sox are on a collision course for the ALCS, a series that should be promising, I would have to say the Yankees hold the slim edge at the moment.

However, none of this will matter if the Rangers and Tigers have their say. The Yankees and Red Sox might be the best teams in the AL, but underdogs seem to have good seasons these days. The Rangers have an explosive offense themselves and did ride it to the World Series last year. C.J. Wilson of the Rangers has also proven to be a good starter, and not many would want to face him. The Tigers also have an ace of their own. No one, and I mean no one, wants to face Justin Verlander in Game 1 of any series against any pitcher. The Tigers rotation does seem less ferocious after him, but don't count out Doug Fister, Rick Porcello, or Max Scherzer who are all solid starters in their own right. In the chance that the Rangers do lose the AL West and the Angels win it, something that seems unprobable but is very possible, no one would want to face their fearsome rotation in any series. If the Yankees and Red Sox are going to play in the ALCS, they'll have their work cut out for them.

Sports July 31, 2011

Is it just me, or every year do people always talk about how so many teams are competing and how not very many players will be traded? And then, when the deadline does roll around, a bunch of players that can potentially change some races are dealt. If Carlos Beltran can give the Giants any offensive production at all, they could end up running away with the NL West. However, he will have his work cut out for him as he will need base runners to drive in runs, something the Giants lack. Hunter Pence, who the Phillies acquired from Houston in response to the Giants acquisition, could be the right handed bat need to put the Braves away in the NL East. I think Pence is better than Beltran, as he is much younger and still has good legs. Pence, in my opinion, will do a better job than Beltran because of the offense around him, the ball park he will play in, and his age. Ubaldo Jimenez, going to Cleveland, can make an impact in the AL Central. The Indians aren't the best team on paper, but Ubaldo does give them star power, has pitched in a postseason game, and, if he is on top is game, is an ace on almost any pitching staff. And after all of that, you still want to tell me no one got moved?

What about Verlander vs. Weaver? I think they are the two best pitchers in the AL, and are definitely going to finish 1 and 2 in the Cy Young voting. The question is who? When they went toe to toe today, I think the question was answered. Justin Verlander threw 7 and 2/3 no hit innings on his way to victory, while Weaver, who pitched well, was ejected. Even though statistics can indicate a lot of things, there is also the big game aspect to a player. It may only be July, but against another pitcher of his caliber, Verlander shined. At this point, unless there is a massive turnaround, Justin Verlander is in line for the Cy Young award. Before this matchup, I had thought the pick should be Jered Weaver, who started the All Star game for the AL and has been dominant all year long. But head to head, Verlander won straight out.

The Eagles have been busy in free agency and trades and have acquired several good defensive players. Maybe its because I'm a Giants fan, but I somehow don't see all these moves paying off for the Eagles. I do think the Eagles will be a factor in the NFC, they will compete for the Super Bowl, but I think they will fall short. After all, acquiring big names in free agency doesn't always translate to winning a Super Bowl; if it did, the Redskins would have won the last five Super Bowls. Instead, the Redskins, despite all their big name acquisitions, have suffered through years where they did not have the draft picks to acquire new talent. The other reason I believe the Eagles will fall short is depth. When looking at all the great defenses in recent memory, like that of the Steelers, Ravens, Patriots, the Giants team that won the Super Bowl, and even last year's Packers, they all had depth. True, all those teams did have Pro Bowl playmakers, but they also had depth. When their starters went down (which will invariably happen) or were subbed out, there was always another guy who could take his place, and the team wouldn't miss a beat. Last year's Packers are a prime example. Several of the Packer's starters went down last season, yet they simply put another guy in, and the team still clicked. Several undrafted rookies came in and did an outstanding job for the Packers. The Eagles may have that depth, and may still acquire it, but 5 players don't make up a defense.

Sports July 17, 2011

The all star break has come and gone and you know what that means, its time for trades. Baseball is unique in that at the trade deadline, a significant number of big name players get moved. Sure there are blockbuster deals in other sports, but most of them happen in the offseason and don't happen nearly as often. Some trades with only one big name player may seem insignificant. Francisco Rodriguez, who went from the Mets to the Brewers, is definitely a significant player to have been traded so far. He happens to be the man who holds the single season saves record and is still very young. Yet, that trade will almost definitely be dwarfed by other trades. Jose Reyes, for example, getting traded will create so much buzz, the Rodriguez trade will definitely seem insignificant. But thats the excitement of it all. The magnitude of trades make some very important trades seem unimportant.

The team Rodriguez got traded to, the Brewers, always seems to be an enigma to me. They do have a solid team, and have been in recent years, yet it always seems to have a glaring weakness. The offensive production has always been there, but other factors are more inconsistent. One year they might lack pitching, and the next relievers. This year, despite all of the good starting pitchers they have, they are 21st overall in ERA. That's not good, but its not the worst of their problems. At home, the Brewers are one of the best teams in the league. On the road, the Brewers are one of the worst. The Brewers inability to win on the road will, in my opinion, be their undoing. It may prevent them from winning the NL Central. Even if they do win it and do make the postseason, I doubt they will win the wild card with 2 very good teams in the East, they will have their hands full playing most of the series on the road. They will more than likely end up playing the Phillies, where they will get killed by the best team in the league. It win the NL Central, but I doubt they can make a World Series run unless they can win on the road.

Sports April 3, 2011

The Yankees were caught "cheating" the other day because they had a coach in the stands relaying information to hitters at the plate. However, the Yankees were very open about the situation and told baseball officials they only had a man behind the plate to relaying information that would be on the scoreboard anyway (the scoreboard had broken down). Baseball officials seem fine with that and have decided not to punish the Yankees in any way. But does it really matter. Teams get to use 1st and 3rd base coaches to relay information and can use signs from the dugout. How is having someone behind the plate that different? Teams pickoff each others' signs anyway, but you don't see a game won or lost because one team used more signs or could read the other team's signs. Baseball games are won on execution, and no matter how many coaches you have relaying signs, someone still has to make a play to win a game.

The Heat are a good team, but they are far from great. They might have three of the most talented players in the league, but that doesn't automatically make you the best team in the league. Yes the Celtics did have a big 3, were the best regular season team, and won a championship all in the same year, but that was with a remarkable supporting cast. The Heat are a solid team and will have a decent playoff run, but that is a far cry from what they were expected to do. They will not win 70 games, they are not the best team in the NBA let alone the Eastern Conference, and Lebron isn't the leading candidate for MVP, I believe that honor belongs to Derrick Rose. They also have not played very well against the better teams. They will steamroll through the first round, but I think they will be done after that.

There is always one team that makes a big splash and makes big moves. Some times, like the '09 Yankees, the team goes on to win a World Series. Other teams, like the '08 Tigers, miss the playoffs completely. This years team is the Red Sox. So far however, their moves don't seem to be paying off. It might be too early to tell, but they just got pounded in a three game sweep by the Rangers. And by pounded, the Rangers were hitting Home Runs everywhere. Unless they can get that part figured out, the Red Sox might be in for another long season.

Sports March 27, 2011

Baseball season is right around the corner. Like in every sport, there usually is a or two team that falls from playoff contention. I think that team this year will be the Rays. There are in a very tough division with the Yankees and Red Sox. The Red Sox added some key players this offseason, and the Yankees are always good. Baltimore also got better, and the Blue Jays can definitely hit. The Rays also lost a lot of key players. They lost Carl Crawford, their speedster and a good part of their defense, Carlos Pena, a very good defender and power hitter, Rafael Soriano, their closer, Jason Bartlet, their shortstop, and Matt Garza, a frontline starter. They did add Johnny Damon and Manny Ramirez, but two veteran outfielders way past their primes cannot help you very much. They do have some good young prospects and Joe Maddon will still have them in contention, but I think they lost too many pieces and only two AL East teams can make the playoffs anyway.

A team that didn't make the playoffs the last year usually makes the playoffs the next year. I think that team is the Cardinals. Despite losing their ace Adam Wainright, the Cardinals still have a very deep rotation. They also have one of the better offences in the NL because, other than the Phillies, there are very few elite offensive teams in the National League. I think they will finish fourth in that category, behind the Phillies, the Brewers, and the Rockies. Albert Pujols and Matt Holiday solidify that lineup. Colby Rasmus should also hit well for them. Ryan Theriot at the top of their lineup should provide a boost. They also have a solid bullpen, and in a weaker division, the best team only won 85 games last year, they should have little trouble making the playoffs. Then again, that's what they said last year...

I believe Evan Longoria will win the AL MVP. He has had some solid seasons and has proven he is an elite player. Even if the Rays don't make the playoffs, he will keep them in contention and will have a strong season. Jon Lester of the Red Sox will win the Cy Young as the Red Sox will rebound and he will be at the forefront. Buster Posey will win the NL MVP because of his success last year and he will be one of the few hitters in a pitching heavy Giants team. Zack Greinke will win the NL Cy Young. Because he will miss the early parts of the season, his superior numbers later on will stand out more.

Sports March 13, 2011

Is there really going to be a lockout in the NFL? I still can't imagine not watching football on a Sunday in the fall. Can't they just come to an agreement? I know the business end of the game and the money there is to be made, but don't you sometimes feel they get a little too greedy? Don't they realize that if they don't come to an agreement, they not only will lose revenues for one year, they will also lose much of their credibility and brand image. That will multiply their problems, and it might take a miracle to bring most fans back.

Even if there is no football season, the free agent market this year should be interesting. Several big players are hitting the market. I think one guy that will definitely get the short end of the stick is Antonio Cromartie. Even if Cromartie is a legitimate corner, he might have difficulty finding a job. The Jets don't really need him after they drafted Kyle Wilson, and he isn't the best corner available. Frankly, he is not quite the player that picked Manning off three times. Defensive backs are pretty hard to come by, but most of the elite teams seem to have one or two corners they really like. For a guy that doesn't tackle well, Cromartie might not end up on a playoff caliber team.

Sports January 23, 2011

You have one of the best running backs of all time, you're on the opposing one yard line, and you throw the football? That's what the Jets did, and it might have cost them the game. You have to like LT's chances to get 1 yard on atleast 2 carriers, even if it is against a very strong Steelers defense. Instead of passing on 2nd and 3rd down, like the Jets did, running on those 2 downs would have helped them more than being stuck with running on 4th down. Say they scored the touchdown there, and got no safety. The score is now 24-17 Steelers. The Jets have all the momentum, stop the Steelers, and get the ball back. They continue to drive down the field as they had been, and get a touchdown, like they did. The score is now tied at 24. The Steelers have to throw, don't score, give the ball back to the Jets. The Jets have multiple timeouts, and win the game. Now, the Jets are going to the Superbowl, and not the Steelers.

What about Caleb Hane? No one thought the Bears would do anything, they were down 2 scores and were yet to score. Yet, Hane, the 3rd Bears' quarterback, came in and did what Jay Cutler, the quarterback they paid so dearly for, and Todd Collins, the wily veteran, could not. That is score. Hane led two touchdown drives, and brought the Bears back in contention. He also out threw Cutler and Collins combined in 1 quarter of play. Even if his effort wasn't enough for a win, he still managed to bring some life into the game. He might not be the Bears' future, but his services might be required by several teams that could be a quarterback away from a playoff run, say the 9ers or the Vikings. Don't be surprised if a move is made to acquire him, and Hane leads the charge into the playoffs.

A Packers vs. Steelers super bowl could be intriguing. Both teams have solid defenses, but I think it will turn into a shootout, especially if the game is close in the 4th quarter. The Packers' defense showed holes in the running game against Matt Forte this week, as he was able to make some gains on the ground in the 4th quarter. This also made it possible for Hane to make gains through the air. Rashard Mendanhall, the Steelers' running back, had a big game against the Jets this week. Even if the Packers do have a strong secondary, they may become vulnerable to Big Ben leaving the pocket and throwing the ball downfield. On the other hand, Aaron Rodgers has proven to be a great quarterback this postseason, and has made several big plays. The Packers receivers, especially Greg Jennings, have been very strong as well. If there are any holes in that very strong Steelers defense, its definitely in their secondary. The Jets managed to find many holes in them in the second half, taking most of their possessions deep into Steeler territory. I think the Packers' passing game will prevail as it often has, and the Packers will take home the Lomardy trophy with a 27-24 victory, with most of the points coming in the fourth quarter.

Did the NFL really change the Pro Bowl to be before the Super Bowl, and not after it? Why would you do something like that? Don't you want the best players to play? The Steelers' Defense came through with another strong showing this year, don't you want them to play in the Pro Bowl? What about the lethal Packers' offense? I don't know if the profit returns are any higher, but now that some of the best players in this league are not going to play simply because the game is before the Super Bowl and have to prepare, why not make it the week after the Super Bowl.